The Headache of Prior Authorization

The challenges of obtaining prior authorizations are further compounded by staffing shortages and a tightened labor market.

For proposed rule 87 FR 3475, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a request for information to determine the need to improve the prior authorization process for medical services.

Last week, the comment period for Electronic Prior Authorization Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria ended.

For the purposes of this request for information, prior authorization generally refers to rules imposed by healthcare payers requiring that approval for a medication, procedure, device, or other medical service be obtained prior to payment for the item or service. Prior authorization requirements are established by payers to help control costs and ensure payment accuracy by verifying that an item or service is medically necessary, meets coverage criteria, and is consistent with standards of care.

Stakeholders have stated that diverse payer policies, provider workflow challenges, and technical barriers create an environment in which the prior authorization process is a source of burden for patients, providers, and payers, and also a contributing cause of burnout for providers (and a health risk for patients, when it delays their care).

ONC’s Strategy on Reducing Regulatory and Administrative Burden Relating to the Use of Health IT and EHRs,released in 2020, identified challenges associated with the prior authorization process, including: a) difficulty in determining whether an item or service requires prior authorization; b) difficulty in determining payer-specific prior authorization requirements for those items and services; c) inefficient use of provider and staff time to navigate communications channels such as fax, telephone, and various web portals; and d) unpredictable and lengthy amounts of time needed to receive payer decisions.

In order to address these issues, the ONC Strategy Team included a number of recommendations to strengthen electronic prior authorization processes, such as leveraging health IT to standardize data and processes used when ordering services or equipment; coordinating efforts to advance new standards approaches; and incentivizing adoption and/or use of technology that can generate and exchange standardized data to support documentation needs.

The ONC Health IT Certification Program could also incorporate standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria to advance electronic prior authorization. A recent March 2022 poll taken by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) found that prior authorization requirements have increased in the past 12 months, causing delays in patient care and increased time spent by medical practice staff.

The challenges of obtaining prior authorizations are further compounded by staffing shortages and a tightened labor market.

In an open letter to the ONC, MGMA stated that “rising prior authorization requirements and the burdens associated with them have long been a pervasive challenge for medical groups trying to focus their time and resources on treating patients. MGMA believes that developing a national standard for electronic prior authorization (ePA) and the supporting electronic attachments would make the PA process more efficient and ultimately benefit patients, as well as drive down administrative burden and cost for providers.”

Although advancing an ePA standardization is critical to achieving automation and improving efficiency, there still is a need to regularly review medical services and prescription drugs that are subject to prior authorization requirements – and to adjust the volume of these accordingly. This should be done at the ONC level, not the for-profit payer level.

Additionally, transparency, communication, and interoperability regarding prior authorizations is lacking. To minimize patient care delays, effective communication between health plans and medical groups is critical. Unfortunately, prior authorization is often completed via fax, telephone, mail, or online proprietary payer portals, and consists of different medical necessity requirements across payers.

These differing requirements, with no standardization – many of which change suddenly, without adequate notice to practices – and the inconsistencies and manual nature of the process result in inefficient communication and delays in patient care.

Larger reform must support continuity of care for medical services and medications for patients.

MGMA believes that ePA has the potential to decrease administrative burden through automation, but only if implemented properly. Without addressing broader reform, automation could simply increase the incidence of prior authorization. Unless the ONC steps in, there is a possibility that automating prior authorizations could lead to health plans unnecessarily expanding their application, both in terms of volume and requirements, thereby negating the desired benefits of ePA.

The ONC needs to consider ways to align ePA standards with payment and QPP (Quality Reporting Programs), but with ensuring that there are adequate guardrails in place to keep payers from manipulating the spirit of the intent for across-the-board standardization of prior authorizations.

The whole point is for standardization, less burden, and to get patients the care they need, without the burden of cumbersome prior authorizations.

Programming Note: Listen to Terry Fletcher today as she reports this story live during Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 Eastern.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Terry A. Fletcher BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, QMPM

Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, CMCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, is a healthcare coding consultant, educator, and auditor with more than 30 years of experience. Terry is a past member of the national advisory board for AAPC, past chair of the AAPCCA, and an AAPC national and regional conference educator. Terry is the author of several coding and reimbursement publications, as well as a practice auditor for multiple specialty practices around the country. Her coding and reimbursement specialties include cardiology, peripheral cardiology, gastroenterology, E&M auditing, orthopedics, general surgery, neurology, interventional radiology, and telehealth/telemedicine. Terry is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays.

Related Stories

Have You Been CHOPD?

Have You Been CHOPD?

The recent cyberattack on UnitedHealth Group’s subsidiary Change Healthcare, also known as Optum, has sent shockwaves through the medical community. This incident, which unfolded in

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Frank Cohen shows you how to leverage the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program (CERT) to create your own internal coding and billing risk assessment plan, including granular identification of risk areas and prioritizing audit tasks and functions resulting in decreased claim submission errors, reduced risk of audit-related damages, and a smoother, more efficient reimbursement process from Medicare.

April 9, 2024
2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.

March 21, 2024
Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.

February 22, 2024
Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Join healthcare attorney David Glaser, as he debunks refund myths, clarifies compliance essentials, and empowers healthcare professionals to safeguard facility finances. Uncover the secrets behind when to refund and why it matters. Don’t miss this crucial insight into strategic refund management.

February 29, 2024
2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDIs on important information in each of the AHA’s 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.

April 15, 2024

Trending News

SPRING INTO SAVINGS! Get 21% OFF during our exclusive two-day sale starting 3/21/2024. Use SPRING24 at checkout to claim this offer. Click here to learn more →